Economies & Governance · Draft-source example
OrientProposed
Public AI evaluation commons
Give public institutions credible evidence for AI adoption decisions.
The bottleneck
Existing benchmarks may not cover the languages, real tasks, and operating costs institutions face.
The proposed work
Academic partnerships, relevant test datasets, shared evaluation software, and independent review.
PL R&D’s proposed role
PL would commission the gap assessment, assemble academic partnerships, and support a host for shared evaluation resources.
What we would examine
Documented use in at least two institutional model-selection or deployment decisions.
- Supporting types:
- Build
- Public timing:
- 18 months
- Classification:
- Source classification
This is a proposed public edition from internal planning drafts, not a verified active commitment. Funding figures and private source links are withheld until a designated publisher reviews them.